Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStoten, David Williamen
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-21T09:03:20Z
dc.date.available2018-09-21T09:03:20Z
dc.date.issued2018-09
dc.identifier.citationStoten, D. (2018) '‘In the real world….’ listening to ‘practitioner‐lecturer’ perspectives of the relevance in the business school curriculum', Journal of pedagogic development 8 (3) 1-20en
dc.identifier.issn2047-3265
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10547/622865
dc.description.abstractThis paper is concerned with eliciting the perspectives of ‘practitioner‐lecturers’ on the delivery of the employability curriculum within a Business School. The term ‘practitioner‐lecturer’ is taken to mean those who have entered academia following an earlier career in industry, the public services or a commercial environment. Given their past experiences and organisational socialisation, it may be that these academics hold different views on the nature of the employability debate. Hitherto, much of the discourse on employability has revolved around an instrumentalist debate concerning how to implement an idealised skill‐set that is meant to encapsulate the learning of students enrolled on a course. In this sense, students are re‐defined in terms of the set of skills they accrue and develop. This reductionist approach has led to calls for a more holistic conception of employability education‐ a viewpoint that may echo with practitioner‐lecturers with their wider experience of work beyond the ivory tower. This paper sought to address central research question: How do practitioner‐lecturers view the relevance of the Business School curriculum, given their professional insights? The findings suggest that the views of practitioner‐lecturers could be incorporated into the design of the future curriculum.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Bedfordshireen
dc.relation.urlhttps://journals.beds.ac.uk/ojs/index.php/jpd/article/view/463/647en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectemployabilityen
dc.subjectemployability frameworksen
dc.subjectpractitioner-lectureren
dc.subjectbusiness and management degreesen
dc.subjectX342 Academic studies in Higher Educationen
dc.title‘In the real world….’ listening to ‘practitioner‐lecturer’ perspectives of the relevance in the business school curriculumen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Northumbria at Newcastleen
dc.identifier.journalJournal of pedagogic developmenten
html.description.abstractThis paper is concerned with eliciting the perspectives of ‘practitioner‐lecturers’ on the delivery of the employability curriculum within a Business School. The term ‘practitioner‐lecturer’ is taken to mean those who have entered academia following an earlier career in industry, the public services or a commercial environment. Given their past experiences and organisational socialisation, it may be that these academics hold different views on the nature of the employability debate. Hitherto, much of the discourse on employability has revolved around an instrumentalist debate concerning how to implement an idealised skill‐set that is meant to encapsulate the learning of students enrolled on a course. In this sense, students are re‐defined in terms of the set of skills they accrue and develop. This reductionist approach has led to calls for a more holistic conception of employability education‐ a viewpoint that may echo with practitioner‐lecturers with their wider experience of work beyond the ivory tower. This paper sought to address central research question: How do practitioner‐lecturers view the relevance of the Business School curriculum, given their professional insights? The findings suggest that the views of practitioner‐lecturers could be incorporated into the design of the future curriculum.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
463-1193-1-SM.pdf
Size:
236.3Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
final version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/