Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWerthern, Helena
dc.contributor.authorAlhusein, Nour
dc.contributor.authorChater, Angel M.
dc.contributor.authorScott, Jenny
dc.contributor.authorFamily, Hannah
dc.contributor.authorNeale, Joanne
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-19T08:50:09Z
dc.date.available2022-07-19T00:00:00Z
dc.date.available2021-07-19T08:50:09Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-26
dc.identifier.citationNeale J, Werthern H, Alhusein N, Chater A, Scott J, Family H (2021) 'Contraceptive choice and power amongst women receiving opioid replacement therapy: qualitative study', Drugs: Education, Prevention, and Policy, (), pp.-.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0968-7637
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09687637.2021.1954599
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10547/625054
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT Background: Women receiving treatment for opioid use disorder have low levels of contraception use and high rates of unintended pregnancies, abortion and children being adopted or fostered. This paper aims to understand the relationship between contraceptive choice and power amongst women receiving Opioid Replacement Therapy (ORT). Methods: During 2016/17, semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 40 women (aged 22–49 years) receiving ORT in the South of England. Data relating to the latent concept of power were inductively coded and analysed via Iterative Categorisation. Findings: The power manifested itself through six interconnected ‘fields’: i. ‘information about fertility and contraception’; ii. ‘access to contraception’; iii. ‘relationships with professionals and services’; iv. ‘relationships with male partners’; v. ‘relationships with sex work clients’; and vi. ‘life priorities and preferences’. Each field comprised examples of women’s powerlessness and empowerment. Even whenwomen appeared to have limited power or control, they sometimes managed to assert themselves. Conclusions: Power in relation to contraceptive choice is multi-faceted and multi-directional, operating at both individual and structural levels. Informed decision-making depends on the provision of clear, non-judgemental information and advice alongside easy access to contraceptive options. Additional strategies to empower women to make contraceptive choices and prevent unplanned pregnancies are recommended.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09687637.2021.1954599
dc.rightsGreen - can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectdrug useen_US
dc.subjectcontraceptionen_US
dc.subjectSubject Categories::L510 Health & Welfareen_US
dc.titleContraceptive choice and power amongst women receiving opioid replacement therapy: qualitative studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKing’s College Londonen_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of New South Walesen_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Bristolen_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Bedfordshireen_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Bathen_US
dc.identifier.journalDrugs: Education, Prevention, and Policyen_US
dc.date.updated2021-07-19T08:43:42Z
dc.description.note12m embargo from pub date when known


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Power+paper+IDEP1954599.pdf
Embargo:
2022-07-26
Size:
1.434Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
author's accepted version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Green - can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Green - can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF